A Qualitative Study Exploring Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing Smoke-free Homes in Georgia

Authors

  • Ana Dekanosidze Department of Hygiene and Medical Ecology Public Health Faculty Tbilisi State Medical University Tbilisi Georgia / Georgian National Center for Disease Control and Public Health Tbilisi Georgia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8681-1265
  • Veriko Gegenava Georgian National Center for Disease Control and Public Health Tbilisi Georgia Author
  • Levan Liluashvili Georgian National Center for Disease Control and Public Health Tbilisi Georgia Author
  • Lela Sturua Georgian National Center for Disease Control and Public Health Tbilisi Georgia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8242-1145
  • Michelle C. Kegler Department of Behavioral Social and Health Education Sciences Rollins School of Public Health Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4898-5454
  • Levan Baramidze Department of Public Health Management Policy and Health Economics Public Health Faculty Tbilisi State Medical University Tbilisi Georgia Author
  • Nino Kiladze Department of Hygiene and Medical Ecology Public Health Faculty Tbilisi State Medical University Tbilisi Georgia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6068-0915
  • Carla J. Berg Department of Prevention and Community Health Milken Institute School of Public Health George Washington Cancer Center George Washington University Washington DC Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8931-1961

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/GBMN.2024.01.01.89

Keywords:

Secondhand smoke exposure, Smoke-free homes, Tobacco

Abstract

Background: Georgia is a middle-income country with high male smoking rates and recently implemented public smoke-free policies. In contexts like Georgia, smoke-free homes (SFHs) can play crucial roles in reducing secondhand smoke exposure and use prevalence. Objectives: This study examined barriers and facilitators to SFHs among Georgian adults. Methods: In February-March 2024, focus groups were conducted separately with smoking and nonsmoking adults in 2 rural communities (n=25; Mage=42.92, 52.0% female, 48.0% married). Data were examined using thematic analysis. Results: Smoking participants (n=13) were primarily (84.6%) male; nonsmoking participants (n=12) were primarily (91.7%) female. Despite 72.2% reporting complete SFH restrictions, several exceptions and implementation challenges were noted. Smoking was commonly allowed for certain people (e.g., guests) or rooms/spaces (e.g., kitchen, balcony). Salient challenges included prevalent male smoking, difficulty changing behavior (smoking in general and smoking in the home), noncompliance, and accommodating guests, older extended family members, and important traditions and celebrations. However, important SFH motives were the health of non-smokers, particularly children, and serving as good role models for children. Conclusions: Effective SFH interventions for Georgian households must address specific characteristics (e.g., high male smoking rates, hospitality, accommodating important traditions) and may serve as models for other countries with similar characteristics.
First page of the article: A Qualitative Study Exploring Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing Smoke-free Homes in Georgia

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Dekanosidze, A., Gegenava, V., Liluashvili, L., Sturua, L., Kegler, M. C., Baramidze, L., Kiladze, N., & Berg, C. J. (2024). A Qualitative Study Exploring Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing Smoke-free Homes in Georgia. Georgian Biomedical and Medical Nexus, 2(4), 181-188. https://doi.org/10.52340/GBMN.2024.01.01.89