Clinical and Voice-Related Characteristics of Teachers Presenting with Voice Disorders in Georgia

Authors

  • Irina Katsarava Department of Otorhinolaryngology Tbilisi State Medical University Tbilisi Georgia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7779-3435
  • Natalia Pavliashvili Department of Pathophysiology Tbilisi State Medical University Tbilisi Georgia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4346-7193
  • Irina Kekelidze Department of Otorhinolaryngology Tbilisi State Medical University Tbilisi Georgia Author
  • Natia Gamkrelidze Department of Pathophysiology Tbilisi State Medical University Tbilisi Georgia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8057-2204
  • Lela Shengelia School of Medicine University of Georgia Tbilisi Georgia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9091-0494

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52340/GBMN.2026.01.01.179

Keywords:

Georgia, Occupational health, Teacher, Videostroboscopic examination, Voice disorder

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Voice disorders represent a common occupational health problem among professionals who rely heavily on vocal communication in their daily work. OBJECTIVES. To explore the clinical characteristics, occupational factors, and perceived voice handicap among teachers presenting with voice disorders in Georgia. METHODS. A clinic-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 teachers presenting with voice complaints at a specialized otolaryngology clinic in Georgia between 2023 and 2025. Participants underwent videostroboscopic examination performed by experienced otolaryngologists. Data on sociodemographic characteristics, occupational conditions, lifestyle factors, comorbidities, and self-reported voice symptoms were collected using a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 21.0. RESULTS. The mean age of participants was 39.3±10.0 years, and 53% were female. Inflammatory laryngeal conditions and benign vocal fold lesions were the most frequently identified diagnostic categories. Hoarseness and variable voice quality were the most reported symptoms. Occupational exposures, including noisy classroom environments and work-related stress, were frequently reported. Participants with benign vocal fold lesions had descriptively higher mean VHI-30 scores than those with inflammatory laryngeal conditions; however, no formal statistical comparison was performed. CONCLUSIONS. This clinic-based study highlights the importance of early clinical assessment, preventive vocal health strategies, and occupational interventions to reduce the burden of voice disorders among teachers.

References

Baghban K, Golmohammadi G, Asadollahpour F. The worldwide prevalence of voice disorders among schoolteachers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Voice. Published online 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.04.018

Azari S, Aghaz A, Maarefvand M, et al. The prevalence of voice disorders and related factors in university professors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Voice. 2024;38(5):1103-1114. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.02.017

Alharbi NS, Alotaibi S, Alnughaythir AI, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of voice disorders among teachers in Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2024;16(3):e56540. doi:10.7759/cureus.56540

Jiang G, Xu X, Yu K, et al. The risk factors of voice disorders in non-university teachers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Voice. Published online 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.10.023

Santos PC, De Medeiros AM, Constantini AC, et al. Teachers' work conditions, voice disorders, and mental health during remote and in-person teaching amid COVID-19. J Voice. Published online 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.07.022

Chao S, Song SA. Videostroboscopy. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.

Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, et al. The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997;6(3):66-70.

Kiran GA, Reddy BR, Spoorthi GD. Evaluation of voice disorders among school teachers: a cross-sectional hospital-based observational study. South Sudan J Health Res. Published online 2025. doi:10.51168/sjhrafrica.v6i9.2159

Muneer A, Sajjad R, Iqbal M, Saleem F, Abdullah M, Riaz M. Experience of teachers with voice disorders: a qualitative study. J Health Wellness Community Res. 2025:e528. doi:10.61919/cm9jgs37

Atalık G, Gölaç H, Yapar D, Gündüz B. Voice disorders in teachers: risk factors and impact on quality of life. J Voice. Published online 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.04.027

Roy N, Weinrich B, Gray SD, et al. Voice amplification versus vocal hygiene instruction for teachers with voice disorders: a treatment outcomes study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45(4):625-638. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/050)

Van Houtte E, Claeys S, Wuyts F, Van Lierde K. The impact of voice disorders among teachers: vocal complaints, treatment-seeking behavior, knowledge of vocal care, and voice-related absenteeism. J Voice. 2011;25(5):570-575. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.04.008

Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Niebudek-Bogusz E, Fiszer M, et al. The prevalence and risk factors for occupational voice disorders in teachers. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2006;58(2):85-101.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-24

How to Cite

Katsarava, I., Pavliashvili, N., Kekelidze, I., Gamkrelidze, N., & Shengelia, L. (2026). Clinical and Voice-Related Characteristics of Teachers Presenting with Voice Disorders in Georgia. Georgian Biomedical and Medical Nexus, 4(3), 170-176. https://doi.org/10.52340/GBMN.2026.01.01.179